WSJ column: appeal best chicken lights

WSJ column: appeal best chicken lights

A contempo WSJ cavalcade highlights what abounding Americans accept conceivably continued been apprehensive of- are red ablaze cameras gluttonous to accumulate the accessible safe, or anchorage a accumulation for government coffers?

A contempo Chicago Tribune poll shows a advanced arrangement of motorists are apprehensive of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel's motives: "Senior citizens and women voters were analogously breach on whether they advantaged or against cameras, but they showed ample accord that they believed Emanuel approved cameras to accession revenue, not save lives."

In some areas of the country, acceleration banned accept additionally remained unjustifiably apathetic afterwards millions of dollars are spent reconstructing anchorage to board college speeds- and somehow acceleration banned abide beneath their optimum- conceivably to advance admission writing, the commodity cites. 

The commodity additionally goes on to account cases of bribery of red ablaze admission vendors: Last anniversary three admiral of Redflex Traffic Systems, an Australia-owned aggregation that operates Chicago's cameras, were accursed over an declared $2 actor affix attack aimed at the bounded official who oversaw the city's camera contract, including ability of Super Bowl tickets and trips to White Sox bounce training.

In some cities, its not alike all about the Benjamins, but conceivably beneath cars, and to amerce those with vehicles, governments are active the prices of buying up. The columnist says "Chicagoans accept annihilation on the blow of the country, of course. In New York, traffic-enforcement cameras aren't aloof about money but about the anti-car calendar of Mayor Mike Bloomberg. But a bigger account is additionally acceptable clearer: Ticket-racketeering has been, let's aloof say, a alienated action with assurance back the auto age was born."

Tweet